Cases 71 - 80 of 135
Schofield v. Dekleva et al
as 6:2014cv01516
Plaintiff:
Preston Schofield
Defendant:
James Dekleva and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston Schofield v. Randy McClean
as 14-14173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY MCCLEAN, Attorney, Individually, Personally, Professionally and Corporately
Preston Schofield v. James Dekleva, et al
as 14-13959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DEKLEVA, Judge, DONALD ESLINGER, Sheriff, FLORIDA SEMINOLE COUNTY and others
Preston Schofield v. James Dekleva, et al
as 14-13598
Petitioner - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES DEKLEVA, Judge, STATE OF FLORIDA and DONALD ESLINGER, Sheriff
Schofield v. Dekleva
as 6:2014cv01187
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva, State of Florida and Sheriff, Seminole County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Dekleva et al
as 6:2014cv01188
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
James Dekleva, State Of Florida and Donald Eslinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schofield v. McClean
as 6:2014cv01006
Plaintiff:
Preston Schofield
Defendant:
Randy McClean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00872
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Schofield v. Gee et al
as 8:2014cv01198
Plaintiff:
Preston Schofield
Defendant:
David Gee, Officer Smith, Judge Heinrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preston Schofield v. James Dekleva, et al
as 14-12030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON LEONARD SCHOFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES DEKLEVA and RANDY MCCLEAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
