Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Gringauz et al v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 0:2009cv60197
Plaintiff:
Steven Gringauz and Susan Gringauz
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company and Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ConSeal International Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company
as 2:2008cv14359
Plaintiff:
ConSeal International Incorporated
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ballard v. The Sherwin-Williams Company et al
as 1:2008cv00824
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Ballard
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company, Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc., Radiator Specialty Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
U.S. Coatings, Inc. v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 1:2008cv00475
Plaintiff:
U.S. Coatings, Inc.
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Counter Claimant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Counter Defendant:
U.S. Coatings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Papp et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc et al
as 0:2007cv61827
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Papp, Charles G. Papp, Catharine Papp and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc, A.W.Chesterton Company, Benjamin-Moore & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Ware et al v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00122
Plaintiff:
Paul N. Ware and Financial Systems Innovation LLC
Defendant:
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., Aeropostale, Inc., Aerogroup Retail Holdings, Inc. and others
Debtor:
West Marine Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lee et al v. The Sherwin-Williams Company
as 8:2007cv00445
Plaintiff:
James E. Lee and Cornelius Hamilton
Defendant:
The Sherwin-Williams Company and The Sherwin-Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
