Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Dollar v. Williamson et al
as 3:2008cv00039
Plaintiff:
Beulah Dollar
Defendant:
Jim Williamson and Sonny Perdue
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Webster v. Perdue et al
as 1:2008cv01342
Plaintiff:
Pedro Webster
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue and James E. Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremiah v. Burnette et al
as 1:2008cv00516
Plaintiff:
Layon Dean Jeremiah
Defendant:
Jack Burnette, Butch Conway, Rodney K. Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Deen et al
as 1:2007mi00420
Plaintiff:
John E. Harris
Defendant:
Sanders B. Deen, Lawerence W. Daniel, Susan Rinks-Severin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens v. Perdue et al
as 1:2007cv03163
Plaintiff:
Terrence Stevens
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Thubert Baker, Myron Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Handel et al
as 5:2007cv00463
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bradley
Defendant:
Karen Handel and Sonny Perdue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redman et al v. Columbus Georgia et al
as 4:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
John Redman and Jane/John Does
Defendant:
Columbus Georgia, Columbus Georgia, Columbus Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehic
Simon v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2007cv02869
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Simon
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Myra H. Dixon, Sonny Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simon v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2007mi00315
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Simon
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Myra H. Dixon, Sonny Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hood et al v. Perdue et al
as 1:2007cv02470
Plaintiff:
James Hood, James Hood, James Hood and others
Defendant:
George Ervin (Sonny) Perdue and Thurbert Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
