Cases 81 - 90 of 134
SHOOPMAN v. DONNIE GOULD RESTORATIONS, INC. et al
as 0:2013cv61030
Plaintiff:
PAUL E. SHOOPMAN
Defendant:
DONNIE GOULD RESTORATIONS, INC., RM CLASSIC CAR PRODUCTIONS (FLORIDA), INC., RM CLASSIC CAR PRODUCTIONS (FLORIDA), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lederman v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 8:2013cv00506
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Lederman
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. , Stryker Orthopaedics Corp. and Alan L. Valadie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
The Continental Insurance Company v. Paul E. Jones Living Trust et al
as 8:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
The Continental Insurance Company
Defendant:
Paul E. Jones Living Trust, Paul E. Jones, Stephen Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Bradley et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2012cv03847
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Bradley and Cherrye Bradley
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Chase Home Finance, LLC
Jarrett v. Austin
as 1:2012mi00169
Plaintiff:
Alex Jarrett
Defendant:
Paul E. Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Barbato v. Duncan et al
as 3:2012cv00966
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Barbato
Defendant:
E. Duncan, D. Daniels, H. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Riggins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 5:2012cv02143
Plaintiff:
Paul E Riggins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHERGI v. DANFORTH
as 1:2012cv01720
Petitioner:
Paul E. Chergi
Respondent:
William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
