Cases 81 - 90 of 339
NARANJO et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03143
Plaintiff:
CARMEN JOHN, DEREK MCDERMEIT, DEVAN DELGADO and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUTHERFORD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv02863
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Isaac Brown v. D. Beasley, et al
as 19-11018
Defendant / Appellee:
J. D. MAYNARD, #7980, D. L. BEASLEY, #6366, R. M. SESSION, #7486 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC BROWN
Domineque Ray v. Commissioner, Alabama Dept.
as 19-10405
Amicus Curiae:
RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOMINEQUE RAY
Clermont v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2019cv10013
Plaintiff:
Rutherford Clermont
Defendant:
US ICE Field Office Dircetor for The District of Miami, Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eubanks v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00217
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Rutherford Eubanks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rutherford v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 4:2018cv10259
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
James Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4001
Murray v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2018cv01328
Plaintiff:
Ian Earl Murray
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, M.K. Simpson, John Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lingebach v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2018cv01215
Defendant:
Ofc. Robert Rose, Ofc. L. Kindon, Sgt. S.G. Gallaher and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lingebach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Medina v. Doe et al
as 5:2018cv00500
Defendant:
FNU Dunbar, John Doe, 2, FNU Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortiz-Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
