Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 34,762
Brittany Hudson v. USA, et al
as 24-11660
Petitioner: BRITTANY HUDSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, ROBERT A. DEYTON DETENTION FACILITY and DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ROBERT A. DEYTON CORRECTION FACILITY
Gabriel et al v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00957
Plaintiff: Kathleen T Gabriel and Terrance C Gabriel
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Walker v. USA
as 7:2024cv00051
Petitioner: FERRELL WALKER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Acosta-Zapata v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00640
Petitioner: Alexander Acosta-Zapata
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ramirez Romero, Jose R. v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60875
Plaintiff: Jose Ricardo Ramirez Romero
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Owolabi v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02288
Petitioner: Bolaji Kazeem Owolabi
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Todd Becker v. USA
as 24-10962
Petitioner: TODD ERLING BECKER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dallas Wims v. USA
as 24-10963
Petitioner: DALLAS JEROME WIMS
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davison v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00645
Plaintiff: Robert L Davison, Jr
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Sebastian III, George v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv21975
Plaintiff: George J. Sebastian III
Defendant: United States of America, Merrick B. Garland and Markenzy Lapointe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?