Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Murzike v. Jay et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
B. R. Jay, M. P. Magruder, Jeremy D. Mosely, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metalonis & Partners LLC et al v. City of Miami Gardens, Florida
as 1:2023cv23574
Plaintiff:
Metalonis & Partners LLC, M&P MG1 LLC and David Metalonis
Defendant:
City of Miami Gardens, Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Doe v. Christiansen et al
as 9:2017cv81115
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
John T. Christiansen , Susan Roy , Gerald Haffey and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Webb v. Miller et al
as 5:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
Lazavius Donnell Webb
Defendant:
C. Miller, M. P. Gass, M. S. Firestone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berkley Insurance Company v. M&P Reynolds Enterprises, INC. et al
as 0:2015cv61134
Plaintiff:
Berkley Insurance Company
Defendant:
M&P Reynolds Enterprises, INC. and Matthew Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Epic Tech, LLC v. Paradise Internet Cafe, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00530
Plaintiff:
Epic Tech, LLC
Defendant:
Paradise Internet Cafe, LLC, M&P Games, LLC, Lucky Joes Sweepstakes LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
ROSENBLOOM v. MORGAN et al
as 3:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE ROSENBLOOM
Defendant:
DAVID MORGAN , J C, S P and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hoewischer v. M & P Shopping Centers, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00941
Plaintiff:
Norman Hoewischer
Defendant:
M & P Shopping Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Bank of Mongolia v. M&P Global Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv60623
Plaintiff:
Bank of Mongolia and Bank of Mongolia
Defendant:
M&P Global Financial Services, Inc., M&P Global Financial Servics Europe, AG, Burton D. Greenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
