Cases 1 - 10 of 7,690
WILLIAMS v. JONES
as 1:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
OCTAVIOUS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN DESHAWN JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morena v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv04221
Petitioner:
Luis Hernandez Morena
Respondent:
William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Pearson Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Pearson Police Department, City of Pearson and Derrick Touchton
Plaintiff:
Keon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trotter v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00170
Defendant:
Sergeant Justin Williams
Plaintiff:
Arnold Leonard Trotter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv04161
Defendant:
Driving 101, LLC, John Does 1-3, Markel Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Discrimination Based on Sex or Blindness - Education
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Discrimination Based on Sex or Blindness - Education
Ryhme v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv04156
Plaintiff:
Carla Ryhme
Defendant:
Jordan McDonald, Robert Toole, Corey Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
