Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Gary Carter, Jr. v. Effingham County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-10842
Plaintiff:
GARY ANTHONY CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
EFFINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WINSTON MOCK, WELLPATH and others
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31904
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Barrs
as 4:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Brian Barrs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24954
Plaintiff:
CLEM ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Effingham County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Effingham County Sheriff's Department, Winston Mock, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16471
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv01098
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv53496
Plaintiff:
JOSH ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TOON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13975
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER TOON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07883
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
