Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Smith v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wiggins et al v. James Ward et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Brandi Wiggins and Sameria Straughn
Defendant:
James Ward, Randy Brock and Antonio Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11927
Plaintiff:
DURRELL ANTONIO SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12193
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SMITH CRUZ and ANTONIO SMITH CRUZ, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38696
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11029
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71966
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONCHAE ANTONIO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 5:2020cv00121
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Santek Waste Services Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01113
Plaintiff:
Antonio Smith
Defendant:
Santek Waste Services Inc , Santek Environmental Inc , Santek Environmental of Alabama LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv02446
Plaintiff:
Cecil Antonio Smith
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
