Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Ortiz Lainez v. Salazar Investments, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Ortiz Lainez
Defendant:
Salazar Investments LLC, Andres F. Salazar, Eliana Zapata and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ortiz v. West Palm Beach Police Department
as 9:2022cv81095
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz
Defendant:
West Palm Beach Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Ortiz-Rolon v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv22264
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Ortiz-Rolon
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43864
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kimble v. United States of America et al
as 7:2021cv00735
Defendant:
C Potter, E Knopp, Angel Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Kenteshia Kimble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ORTIZ-NIEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18043
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ORTIZ-NIEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99114
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Miguel Ortiz-Rolon
as 20-12401
Petitioner:
In re: MIGUEL ANGEL ORTIZ-ROLON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ORTIZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40189
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO ANGEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIEVES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37725
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ORTIZ NIEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
