Cases 1 - 10 of 876
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange v. United Van Lines, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60855
Plaintiff:
Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange a/s/o Gary Lifton and Danielle Queller Lifton
Defendant:
United Van Lines, LLC and Armstrong Relocation Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 0081 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Armstrong v. Florida Memorial University, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60634
Plaintiff:
Mikyla Armstrong
Defendant:
Florida Memorial University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Armstrong v. Florida Memorial University, Inc.
as 0:2024cv60635
Plaintiff:
Mikyla Armstrong
Defendant:
Florida Memorial University, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
BRYANT v. KIRKLAND et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
BUSTER BRYANT
Defendant:
AARON A KIRKLAND, PATTON and ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong-Deeble v. Valenti
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Linda Armstrong-Deeble
Defendant:
Leah Valenti
Raytaurus Armstrong v. Florida Attorney General, et al
as 24-10698
Petitioner:
RAYTAURUS EMON ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
