Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Cameron et al
as 3:2013cv00102
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
James S. Cameron, George R. Davis, Sr., Robert B. Dixon, Jr. and others
George Davis, et al v. BancInsure, Inc.
as 13-11708
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE R. DAVIS, JAMES S. CAMERON, R. B. DIXON, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BANKINSURE, INC.
:
SERVICE
Branch et al v. Sickert et al
as 2:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
K. Craig Branch , Mary W. Branch , Catherine Branch Chestnut and others
Defendant:
Jayme B. Sickert, John T. Ottinger, Jr., Jack R. Wehmiller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Hawkins v. Cone et al
as 4:2010cv00437
Plaintiff:
Melvin G. Hawkins
Defendant:
Matt Cone, B Dixon, Robert Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Young et al
as 5:2009mc00015
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Acorn Capitol Management LLC and Acorn II LP
Receiver:
Oak Grove Partners LP, Neely Young and W B Dixon Stroud, Jr
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Young et al
as 1:2009mc00028
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Acorn Capital Management, LLC, Acorn II, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Young et al
as 2:2009mc03457
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Donald Anthony Walker Young, Donald Anthony Walker Young, Acorn Capital Management, LLC and others
Receiver:
Louis C. Bechtle, Louis C. Bechtle and Louis C. Bechtle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Dixon et al v. Jackson
as 2:2007cv00004
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Dixon and Annie L. Dixon
Defendant:
Harrison Sanford Jackson and Harrison Sanford Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
