Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Botelho et al v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
as 9:2024cv80530
Plaintiff:
George Botelho and Inna Botelho
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BOTELHO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18626
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOTELHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOTELHO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52626
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOTELHO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00621
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vielma et al v. Gruler et al
as 6:2018cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jose Vielma , Carmen Nilda Capo-Quinones , Bernedette Cruz and others
Defendant:
Adam Todd Gruler , John Does 1-20, John Does 21-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rene Alvarez, et al v. USA
as 16-16479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENE ALVAREZ, SIMONE ALVAREZ, ANTHONY ANGLADA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv60446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Botelho et al v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00102
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide and MENTOR CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Botelho and Keith Botelho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alvarez et al v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rene Alvarez , Simone Alvarez , Anthony Anglada and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
