Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Michael BoweIn re: Michael Bowe
as 24-11704
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL S. BOWE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sydney Keefe v. Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc., et al
as 24-11252
Plaintiff:
SYDNEY MARIE KEEFE
Defendant:
BRITT'S BOW WOW BOUTIQUE, INC. and MERRI COLVARD
Mauldin Brand, Inc. v Moss
as 1:2024cv01227
Defendant:
Shad Gregory Moss and Bow Wow
Plaintiff:
Mauldin Brand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Rodas v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ronald Rodas
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Levon Allen, Victor Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sydney Keefe v. Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc., et al
as 23-14024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SYDNEY MARIE KEEFE
Defendant / Appellant:
BRITT'S BOW WOW BOUTIQUE, INC. and MERRI COLVARD
BOWES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31142
Plaintiff:
CRAIG BOWES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Forbes v. Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv23216
Plaintiff:
Adrian Forbes
Defendant:
Britt's Bow Wow Boutique, Inc and Merri Colvard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BOWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20153
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN BOWE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maltais v. Bullseye Bow, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MALTAIS, JR.
Defendant:
BULLSEYE BOW, LLC and NEIL KAHRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mauldin Brand Inc. v. Black Promoters Collective LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04284
Defendant:
Shad Gregory Moss, Black Promoters Collective LLC, G Squared Events Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Mauldin Brand Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
