Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Brunson v. Green et al
as 5:2024cv00541
Plaintiff: Albert Brunson
Defendant: Green, Howell and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONYERS v. JESTER et al
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff: RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant: WARDEN T JESTER, DEPUTY WARDEN GRAHAM, CAPTAIN HAMILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Edgar v. Marion Brunson, et al
as 24-10412
Plaintiff: BOBBY WAYNE EDGAR
Defendant: MARION B. BRUNSON, JUSTIN A. SPENCE, ANTHONY TEW and others
Brunson v. Watson et al
as 6:2023cv02455
Plaintiff: Darranekia Leshenna Brunson
Defendant: Stephen Reginald Watson and R.E. Garrison Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BRUNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13872
Plaintiff: JASON SHAWN BRUNSON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRUNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02209
Plaintiff: JASON BRUNSON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRUNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01823
Plaintiff: TONY BRUNSON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRUNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01257
Plaintiff: RICKY N. BRUNSON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRUNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01260
Plaintiff: RICKY N. BRUNSON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRUNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff: RICKY N. BRUNSON
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?