Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Craven Casper v. FPC Montgomery Warden, et al
as 24-10948
Petitioner:
CRAVEN CASPER
Respondent:
FPC MONTGOMERY WARDEN and CHIEF UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Craven Casper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-10400
Plaintiff:
CRAVEN CASPER
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Craven Casper v. USA, et al
as 24-10398
Plaintiff:
CRAVEN CASPER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROBERT WALTERS
Casper v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv20322
Plaintiff:
Craven Casper
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ghasimi v. Backstretch-South Florida, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60111
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Ghasimi
Defendant:
Backstretch-South Florida, LLC doing business as Elements Massage and Louise Casper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Casper v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv24804
Plaintiff:
Craven Casper
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CASPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25998
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CASPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LITTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13417
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASPER LITTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CASPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05859
Plaintiff:
CODY CASPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
