Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Nelson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Adrienne Givens, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREESE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93535
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS EDWARD FREESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUSELTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35362
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS EDWARD HUSELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv31972
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS EDWARD DUNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHRISTENSEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13403
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS EDWARD CHRISTENSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Curtis Nelson
as 19-11763
Not Yet Classified:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner:
In re: CURTIS EDWARD NELSON
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 2:2018cv01025
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, David E Gay, Jr, Terry T. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 4:2018cv00837
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Jeff Dunn, Ruth Naglich, MHM Correctional Services Inc and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Bolling et al
as 2:2018cv00838
Petitioner:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Respondent:
Leon Bolling and Attorney General for the State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. Dunn et al
as 2:2018cv00565
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, Ruth Naglich, MHM Correctional Services Inc and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
