Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DOUGLAS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06538
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEACH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25140
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS BEACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bright v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Bright
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MEDEMA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03203
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DOUGLAS MEDEMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NIES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31217
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEVON CHARLES DOUGLAS NIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bellaire v. Pratt
as 2:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Laura Bellaire and Progressive Insurance Company
Defendant:
Charles Douglas Pratt and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Douglas v. Kent et al
as 2:2015cv02232
Plaintiff:
Skyler Charles Douglas
Defendant:
Ronnie Mack Kent and Blount County Correctional Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummins v. Blount County Correctional Facility
as 2:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Cummins, III
Defendant:
Blount County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Astrue (CONSENT)
as 1:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Charles Douglas Hudson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Watercolor Management, Inc. v. Gooch's Market, LLC et al
as 5:2008cv00998
Plaintiff:
Watercolor Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Gooch's Market, LLC, Charles Douglas Gooch, Jr., Charles Douglas Gooch, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
