Cases 1 - 10 of 317
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams v. Coffee County, Georgia et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Defendant:
Anthony White, Miguel Contreras, Unknown Officer 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Pernell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GRACE, Inc., et al v. City of Miami
as 24-11550
Plaintiff:
GRACE, INC., ENGAGE MIAMI, INC., SOUTH DADE BRANCH OF THE NAACP and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI
Contreras v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80462
Plaintiff:
Jorge Contreras
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Promeco S.A .de C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Arias et al v. Electrical Millsgut Enterprise LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Jesus Arias, Jose Johanny Velazco, Jhonny Antonio Rangel Contreras and others
Defendant:
Electrical Millsgut Enterprise LLC and Sergio Millan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kimera Labs, Inc. v. Exocel Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024mc21426
Plaintiff:
Kimera Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
Exocel Bio, Inc., Raj Jayashankar, DEB HUBERS and others
Ramiro Contreras v. Bibb County CF Warden
as 24-10996
Petitioner:
RAMIRO DELREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent:
BIBB COUNTY CF WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kimera Labs, Inc. v. Exocel Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21426
Plaintiff:
Kimera Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
Exocel Bio, Inc., Raj Jayashankar, DEB HUBERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
