Cases 1 - 10 of 21
CRAWFORD v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12759
Plaintiff:
Philip D. Crawford and PHILIP D CRAWFORD
Defendant:
UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CRAWFORD v. GARLAND
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D CRAWFORD and ASIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
COLETTE PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CRAWFORD v. FCI MARIANNA
as 5:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D CRAWFORD and ASIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
FCI MARIANNA, ADAM MCCORD, KEVIN D PISTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Southern Milling & Lumber, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01573
Plaintiff:
Melissa D. Crawford
Defendant:
Southern Milling & Lumber, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CRAWFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64203
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS D CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRAWFORD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54971
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crawford v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jhamal D. Crawford
Defendant:
Donald Trump and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPIVEY v. SCHLOFMAN et al
as 4:2020cv00095
Defendant:
PAGE A SMITH, LEONARD SCHLOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00712
Plaintiff:
Jhamal D. Crawford
Defendant:
William A. Tate and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jhamal Crawford v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 19-13833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JHAMAL D. CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
KAY IVEY, JEFFERSON S. DUNN and PATRICE RICHIE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
