Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Robinson v. Sanders et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Elijah Deshawn Robinson
Defendant:
Demarcus Sanders, A. Murphy, Jamal D. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01195
Petitioner:
Jonathan Michael Burton
Defendant:
G. Smith, D. Mitchell and E. Prock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UTRIA v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
RICHARD UTRIA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COURTNEY L. BRANCH, ROBERT GOULD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Utria v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Richard Utria
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Courtney L. Branch, Robert Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sykes v. Mitchell
as 0:2023cv60562
Plaintiff:
Tiffani Sykes
Defendant:
Marlene D Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02691
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59699
Plaintiff:
ETHAN D MITCHELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Richard Mitchell
as 21-13091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD D. MITCHELL
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv04313
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27286
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL D MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
