Cases 1 - 10 of 12
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20534
Plaintiff:
DARRYL JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knight et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00903
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Knight, ZACHARY HUEY, BRYAN HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv62380
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22813
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darryl Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 19-13689
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL JOHNSON
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05962
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Darryl Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas)
as 8:2018cv01434
Petitioner:
Darryl Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 7:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Darryl Johnson
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Darryl Johnson v. Warden
as 13-10741
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Johnson v. Haynes
as 2:2012cv00128
Petitioner:
Darryl Johnson
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
