Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Smith v. Catamount Properties 2018, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, Rubin Lublin, LLC, Kimberly A. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2023cv04808
Plaintiff:
Arthur Edward Smith
Defendant:
David J. Smith and Peter F. Busscher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Petrosyan v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Gurgen Petrosyan
Defendant:
David J. Smith, William H. Pryor, Jr. and Marcia Morales Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03897
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03055
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
DAVID E SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: David Smith
as 23-12868
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID CURTIS SMITH
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv02348
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Alexander, Kimberbly Brock, Kimberly Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
HEPHZIBAH v. PHILLIPS et al
as 4:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
SYTERIA HEPHZIBAH
Defendant:
JOHN PHILLIPS, ELIZABETH WARREN, TRACI E ABRAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tusha v. E2Company et al
as 2:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Simon Tusha
Defendant:
E2Company, James Richmond, Jeanne Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
