Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WILDER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
ANTONIOUS WILDER and LARRY A DAWKINS
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ALCALA v. MICHAEL DAWKINS GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv24789
Plaintiff:
JORGE L. ALCALA
Defendant:
MICHAEL DAWKINS GROUP, INC. and MICHAEL DAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Dawkins v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv05455
Plaintiff:
Allan Dale Dawkins
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Christopher Smith v. Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13793
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RANDALL SANDLIN, M. C. DAWKINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
DAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv07584
Plaintiff:
MARK TIMOTHY DAWKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAWKINS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03919
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAWKINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
