Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DAUM v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
MARISA D. DAUM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAUM v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14761
Plaintiff:
COLE CARTER DAUM
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Daum v. City of Summerville et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Zachary Daum
Defendant:
City of Summerville, Former Chief Stan Mosley, Officer Matthew Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Southerland v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Blackman, Warden Kevin Sprayberry, Civil and others
Plaintiff:
Malik Southerland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv13078
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E DAUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell v. Unknown Defendants
as 4:2020cv00129
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Warden P. Ballinger, Warden K. Sprayberry and others
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAUM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41124
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DAUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Calhoun v. The Hood Law Group et al
as 1:2015cv03524
Plaintiff:
Marlina Calhoun
Defendant:
The Hood Law Group, Theresa Hood, Jefferey Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daum et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 9:2009cv81181
Plaintiff:
Donald Daum and Connie Daum
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cole v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2007cv00251
Plaintiff:
Carol Cole
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, Doug Daum, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
