Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Foster v. Douglas County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv04525
Plaintiff:
Mendal Dewayne Foster
Defendant:
Kellman Food Services and Douglas County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byers v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv04501
Respondent:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Petitioner:
Valenton B Byers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clifton Alexander v. Douglas County Sheriff
as 24-12352
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON Q. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF
Bright v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv02925
Defendant:
Douglas County, Fulton County, Rashida Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Boone Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Pounds et al
as 1:2024cv03351
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allyn Carson
Defendant:
Tim Pounds, Douglas County Jail, Duane Whisenhunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Pounds et al
as 1:2024cv02488
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Allyn Carson
Defendant:
Len Deese, Duane Whisenhunt, Douglas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifton Alexander v. Douglas County Sheriff
as 24-11054
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON Q. ALEXANDER
Defendant:
DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.