Cases 1 - 10 of 37
EDELEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv22057
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA EDELEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EDELEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08897
Plaintiff:
PAUL EDELEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Soto v. Edelen
as 5:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Matteo Manuel Soto
Defendant:
Christopher Edelen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Brevard County)
as 6:2021cv01623
Plaintiff:
Jerome M. Allen
Defendant:
Mark S Inch, Ashley B. Moody and Christopher Edelen
Petitioner:
Jerome (NMN) Allen
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDELEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51840
Plaintiff:
PAUL GREGORY EDELEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDELEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49367
Plaintiff:
PAUL EDELEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodney Mountjoy v. Christopher Edelene
as 21-11614
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EDELENE, Colonel
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY C. MOUNTJOY
Coleman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv21717
Defendant:
J. Dawson, J-Pay Corporation, Warden D. Snider and others
Plaintiff:
Shaw Vale Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUXAMA v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00583
Defendant:
MARK INCH, C NEEL, KITZ MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL LUXAMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
