Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Soto v. Barner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Darius Jason Soto
Defendant:
Reginald Barner, Morgan Stephenson, Eric Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10807
Plaintiff:
EDWIN RIVERA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIVERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58316
Plaintiff:
EDWIN RIVERA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45254
Plaintiff:
NATHAN EDWIN RIVERA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13972
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71635
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Diogenes Mendez
as 20-10684
Defendant / Appellant:
DIOGENES BERNABEL MENDEZ, a.k.a. Edwin Rivera, a.k.a. Neno
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ADAMS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03187
Plaintiff:
CHASE STEPP, JONATHAN ALBERT, JOHN PURCELL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vielma et al v. Gruler et al
as 6:2018cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jose Vielma , Carmen Nilda Capo-Quinones , Bernedette Cruz and others
Defendant:
Adam Todd Gruler , John Does 1-20, John Does 21-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. SunTrust Bank
as 8:2018cv01050
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rivera
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank
Mediator:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
