Cases 1 - 10 of 313
Latham, John v. Matos et al
as 9:2024cv81047
Defendant:
Dr Hipolito Matos and The GEO Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Farron Latham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. THE GEO GROUP INC et al
as 3:2024cv00383
Defendant:
SERGEANT CHILES, THE GEO GROUP INC and SERGEANT R. DAVIS
Plaintiff:
DARRELL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rease, Michael v. Lieutenant Brown et al
as 9:2024cv80979
Plaintiff:
Michael Rease
Defendant:
Lieutenant Brown and GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BERGER v. SMITH et al
as 3:2024cv00350
Defendant:
D SMITH, JANE DOE #1, JOHN WILTZ and others
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BERGER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARNEY v. GEO GROUP
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
ADAM C FARNEY
Defendant:
GEO GROUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdeljaber v. Department of Justice et al
as 8:2024cv01315
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Phelps, Lieutenant Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Odeh Abdeljaber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rosa, Julio N. v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv80253
Plaintiff:
Julio Nehomar Rosa
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, GEO Group Inc. and South Bay Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson III v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Marshall Watson III
Defendant:
State of Florida, f.c.c.c., GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Geo Group, Inc et al
as 9:2023cv81331
Plaintiff:
Scotty Santos Diaz
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc, H. Matos, Marie Michelle Amede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
