Cases 1 - 10 of 79
James Van Meerten v. USA
as 24-10016
Petitioner:
JAMES ARTHUR VAN MEERTEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. James Van Meerten
as 23-13774
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR VAN MEERTEN
STEVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19300
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARTHUR STEVENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00906
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, David Daniel Ackman, Richard Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
James Arthur Alston, Sr. v. S Gregory, et al
as 23-10611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR ALSTON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. S GREGORY, Health Service Administrator, Coastal State Prison, official capacity and DR. OLATUNJI AWE, Medical Director, Coastal State Prison, official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alston Sr. v. Gregory et al
as 4:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Alston Sr.
Defendant:
S. Gregory and Dr. Olatunji Awe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Warden, Central Florida Reception Center
as 6:2022cv01604
Petitioner:
James Arthur Russell
Respondent:
Warden, Central Florida Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alston Sr. v. S. Gregory et al
as 4:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Alston Sr.
Defendant:
S. Gregory and Dr. O Awe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v Morgan and Morgan
as 6:2022cv01579
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Russell
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
