Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63194
Plaintiff:
JAMES DALTON PARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Velie et al v. South Florida Electric, LLC et al
as 9:2015cv80236
Plaintiff:
Steven Velie and James Dalton Holloway
Defendant:
South Florida Electric, LLC and James R. Coleman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Vision Bank v. 145, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00521
Plaintiff:
Vision Bank
Defendant:
145, LLC, Scott D. Deichmann, Anthony J. Bordlee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler et al v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01850
Plaintiff:
Robert Butler, Robert Butler, Sammie Coffer and others
Defendant:
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Type:
Torts - Injury
Bell v. United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00132
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell v. United States of America et al
as 4:2007cv00196
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell v. United States of America et al
as 6:2007cv01926
Respondent:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2007cv00506
Petitioner:
JAMES DALTON BELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
