Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
JEREMY DUNCAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv77429
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUNCAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv43775
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JEREMY DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RINGLER et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03328
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY SMITH, ANDREW NIEZGODA, CORY MYRES and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duncan v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2017cv04842
Petitioner:
Jeremy Duncan
Respondent:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Vance Laughlin and Gregory C. Dozier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Santoyo v. Henry County, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv03974
Plaintiff:
Darlene Rebecca Santoyo
Defendant:
Henry County, Georgia , Keith McBrayer , Flint Circuit Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemphill v. Henry County, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv03977
Plaintiff:
Phillip J. Hemphill
Defendant:
Henry County, Georgia , Keith McBrayer , Flint Circuit Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hom v. Hay et al
as 1:2016cv04014
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bing Hom
Defendant:
Jason Hay, Jeremy Duncan, Derrick Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hom v. Hay et al
as 1:2016cv00672
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bing Hom
Defendant:
Jason Hay, Jeremy Duncan, Derrick Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. DUNCAN et al
as 7:2011cv00143
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD ROBINSON, JR
Defendant:
JEREMY DUNCAN, Travis Sparks, CARL DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
