Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mosley v. Ellington et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00547
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Bruce Hodges, Edward Ellington and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lorenzo Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosley v. Ellington et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Leon Bolling, Bruce Hodges, Edward Ellington and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lorenzo Mosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malloy v. Peters et al
as 4:2012cv02538
Plaintiff:
Arthur Brennan Malloy
Defendant:
Kenneth N Peters, Carter F Davenport, John Mason and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shack v. Mason et al
as 4:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Shack
Defendant:
John Mason, Carter Davenport and Talley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Carson et al
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Daundera Dwight Pierce
Defendant:
Arethia Carson, Willie Myles, John Mason and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason et al v. Hale et al
as 7:2011cv03155
Plaintiff:
John Mason, IV and Ishmael Gregory
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Jefferson County Alabama , Jefferson County Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Thomas et al
as 4:2010cv03633
Plaintiff:
David B Fuller
Defendant:
Thomas, Laura Isbell, Carl Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Kirrire et al
as 4:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Wade Kirrire, David Wise, Russell A. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Mason et al
as 4:2009cv00959
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillips
Defendant:
John Mason and Donald Lumkia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jemison v. Wade et al
as 4:2009cv00795
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jemison
Defendant:
Kizzire Wade, John Mason and Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
