Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Winters v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv05700
Plaintiff:
Dominique Jabril Winters
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jones v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2022cv04809
Plaintiff:
Jabril Sidney Jones and Jibril Sidney McGlowan
Defendant:
Cobb County, Magistrate Judge Charles Chesbro, Marty First and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Saunders v. Lopez et al
as 3:2017cv00690
Plaintiff:
James Earl Saunders, III
Defendant:
Jo Ann Lopez, Kire Khadair Jabril Twiggs, Frank Brookings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El Bey v. City of Madison et al
as 5:2017cv00621
Plaintiff:
Jabril El Bey
Defendant:
City of Madison, Madison Municipal Court, David W. Templeton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04190
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
USA v. Jabril Battle
as 12-14916
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JABRIL BATTLE, a.k.a. Kevin Jerard Conard, a.k.a. Michael Antonio Singleton, a.k.a. Gilbert J Jackson, a.k.a. Vincent Jae Larue, a.k.a. Kevin G Conrad, a.k.a. Neal Joppson, a.k.a. Gebrael Den Atun El, a.k.a. G. D. Atun
USA v. Kevin Conard
as 12-14908
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN JERARD CONARD, a.k.a. Jabril Battle, a.k.a. Kevin G Conrad, a.k.a. Neal Joppson, a.k.a. Gebrael Den Atun El, a.k.a. G.D. Atun
Gebrael Atun El v. Warden
as 11-15470
Petitioner - Appellant:
GEBRAEL DEN ATUN EL, a.k.a. Jabril Battle
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
