Cases 1 - 10 of 10
TRUSSELL v. SIEGMEISTER et al
as 1:2014cv00195
Petitioner:
TERRY GEORGE TRUSSELL
Respondent:
JEFFREY A SIEGMEISTER, JAMES C HANKINSON, PAM BONDI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DANIELS v. BONDI et al
as 4:2014cv00392
Petitioner:
DALE CHRISTOPHER DANIELS, JR
Respondent:
PAMELA JO BONDI, LARRY CAMPBELL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randall Rolle v. Charles Perry, et al
as 14-13332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES PERRY, Officer, RON MCNEAL, Investigator, MIKE WOMBLE, Sergeant and others
ROLLE v. DILMORE et al
as 4:2014cv00339
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
MICHAEL DILMORE, HOLLY LOFLAND, TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLE v. PERRY et al
as 4:2014cv00340
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
CHARLES PERRY, RON MCNEAL, MIKE WOMBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOKS v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
TAREYAN COOKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, LARRY CAMPBELL, TED PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Daniels, Jr. v. Anthony Geraldi, et al
as 13-15634
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE CHRISTOPHER DANIELS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY GERALDI, Deputy Badge 415, JASON MANNIE, Asst. State Attorney and JAMES C. HANKINSON, Judge
DANIELS v. GERALDI
as 4:2013cv00413
Plaintiff:
DALE CHRISTOPHER DANIELS, JR
Defendant:
ANTHONY GERALDI, JASON MANNIE and JAMES C HANKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOWARD v. DICKERSON et al
as 4:2007cv00306
Plaintiff:
GILBERT D HOWARD
Defendant:
FRED DICKERSON, DRAKE, LARRY CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROLLE v. HANKINSON et al
as 4:2007cv00167
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant:
JAMES C HANKINSON, THOMAS H BATEMAN, SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
