Cases 1 - 10 of 284
HIGHSMITH v. USA
as 4:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
JIMMY LEE HIGHSMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kroft v. ONeal
as 2:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Kroft
Defendant:
ONeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Howard
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dansby v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Dansby
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. Jimmy Spencer
as 24-10318
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JIMMY LEE SPENCER
CATES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11611
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE CATES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rhodes v. Craig et al
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Craig et al
as 4:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Rhodes
Defendant:
Daniel J. Craig and The State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06845
Plaintiff:
JIMMY FRANKS and JIMMY LEE FRANKS, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EDWARDS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06259
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE EDWARDS JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
