Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rhodes et al v. City of Madison, The
as 5:2025cv02087
Plaintiff:
Brenton Rhodes, Brandon Burgess, Bryant Smith and others
Defendant:
City of Madison, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16169
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18885
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HOWARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kenneth Howard v. DeKalb County, et al
as 23-11035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
DEKALB COUNTY and JORDAN VANCE
Howard v. DeKalb County et al
as 1:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Howard
Defendant:
DeKalb County and Jordan Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04730
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv38548
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08286
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00656
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03069
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES, JORDAN BLACKBURN, RICARDO DIXON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
