Cases 1 - 10 of 32
OWENS v. MIDDLEBROOKS et al
as 5:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
KEVIN OWENS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, MIDDLEBROOKS, ELLISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv02636
Petitioner:
Kevin Owen Burress
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden John Doe of Robert A Deyton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burress v. GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04897
Plaintiff:
Kevin Owen Burress
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc., Merrick Garland and US Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. Woulden et al
as 1:2022cv00877
Petitioner:
Kevin Owen Burress
Respondent:
Nick Woulden and R.C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burress v. Alabama, State of et al
as 4:2021cv01726
Plaintiff:
Kevin Owen Burress
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Georgia, State of, Dade County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. Dade County, Georgia et al
as 4:2021cv00249
Plaintiff:
Kevin Owen Burress
Defendant:
Dade County, Georgia, State of Georgia, DeKalb County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burress v. United States et al
as 4:2021cv01551
Petitioner:
Kevin Owen Burress
Respondent:
United States, State of Georgia, Dade County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00211
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burress v. United States et al
as 4:2021cv00208
Petitioner:
Kevin Owen Burress
Respondent:
United States, State of Georgia and Dade County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
