Cases 1 - 10 of 365
USA v. Jamal Alexander
as 24-11997
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMAL LIVINGSTON ALEXANDER
Livingston v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Michael Livingston
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00121
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Livingstone v. Semper Laser LLC
as 0:2024cv60440
Plaintiff:
Robert Livingstone
Defendant:
Semper Laser LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Livingston v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Holli Livingston
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Parris EL v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 0:2024cv60092
Plaintiff:
Dexter Livingston Parris EL
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and M. Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Livingston v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Livingston
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Parris EL v Gilliam
as 0:2023cv62125
Plaintiff:
Dexter Livingston Parris EL
Defendant:
M. Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parris EL v. Gilliam et al
as 0:2023cv61846
Plaintiff:
Dexter Livingston Parris EL
Defendant:
M. Gilliam, Joseph Galaska and Harold F. Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
