Cases 1 - 10 of 1,436
Luzier v. Wheeler et al
as 6:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Luzier, III
Defendant:
Cleveland Wheeler, FNU Lane, Ryan Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
MARK HAWKINS
Defendant:
LANE COLLINS and WAGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lane v. Complete Maintenance Company
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Lane
Defendant:
Complete Maintenance Company
CadleRock, LLC v. BCL Ventures, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
CadleRock, LLC
Defendant:
BCL Ventures, Inc. and Chance Axton Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Paolocci et al v. First Protective Insurance Company d/b/a Frontline Insurance
as 2:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Lane Paolocci and Shannon Paolocci
Defendant:
First Protective Insurance Company d/b/a Frontline Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Paolocci et al v. First Protective Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Lane Paolocci and Shannon Paolocci
Defendant:
First Protective Insurance Company d/b/a Frontline Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053 Breach of Insurance Contract
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
