Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Daniel Le Clerc, Sr. v. John Guy, et al
as 24-11047
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LE CLERC, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN I. GUY and MARK R. MILLER
Le Clerc v. Guy et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Daniel Allen Le Clerc, Sr.
Defendant:
John I. Guy and Mark R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12435
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY MILLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
MILLER v. DOE et al
as 5:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
MARK ELLIS MILLER
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE, BALDWIN CI and HANCOCK CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kim v. The Twelfth Judicial Circuit Court et al
as 8:2020cv02934
Defendant:
Hunter W. Carroll, Mark S. Miller, Westwater Construction, Inc., A Florida Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Kim v. USA
as 21-10450
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL MORGAN, an individual, MARK S. MILLER, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KIM
Kim v. United States of America et al
as 8:2020cv02791
Defendant:
Lisa M. Castellano, Westwater Construction, Inc., Mark S. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02225
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020mc00086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
