Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dusty Bowman v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11274
Plaintiff:
DUSTY L. BOWMAN
Defendant:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MR RICHARD COMERFORD, Deputy Secty of Institutions, WAKULLA CI WARDEN and others
Jackson, Jr. v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Donnie James Jackson, Jr., Ben-Shalom Israel and Ben-Shalom Yisrael-Benyahweh
Defendant:
Dixon, Senior Chaplian, Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pasco County Detention Center et al
as 8:2020cv02752
Defendant:
Sergeant Ojeda, Mailroom Supervisor, Pasco County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kazarian v. Ivey et al
as 6:2019cv00490
Defendant:
Mailroom Supervisor, Wayne Ivey, Lt. Sahllel and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen H. Kazarian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda v. Ivey et al
as 6:2018cv01842
Defendant:
Mailroom Supervisor, Wayne Ivey and Sgt. Dinardo
Plaintiff:
Randall Miranda, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Ivey et al
as 6:2018cv01455
Defendant:
Mailroom Supervisor, John Does 1-10, Law Library Supervisor and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Derell Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Jail Director et al
as 3:2017cv01204
Plaintiff:
Barry Reed
Defendant:
Jail Director and Mailroom Supervisor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Hoke v. Mr. Lyle, et al
as 17-11278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN RAY HOKE
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. LYLE, Chaplain, WARDEN and TIFFANY HENRY, Mailroom Supervisor
Matthew Thompson v. L. Flowers
as 16-12825
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW JOHN THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
L. FLOWERS, Mailroom Supervisor
Owens v. Morales et al
as 4:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jackie D. Owens
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
