Cases 1 - 10 of 42
KHAYRALLAH v MAHON
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
KOJO KHAYRALLAH
Defendant:
MARK H MAHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCGRAW v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Mark H. McGraw, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brenner v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 9:2023cv81490
Plaintiff:
Mark H Brenner
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GITOMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv06729
Plaintiff:
MARK H GITOMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Viegas et al v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv10066
Plaintiff:
James Viegas and Keri Lynn Viegas
Defendant:
Mark H. Jones, Devonna Alce, Kevin Madok and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Williams v. Cohen et al
as 1:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
John T Williams
Defendant:
Mark H Cohen, Steven D Grimberg, Thomas W Thrash, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estinfil v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 4:2023cv10050
Plaintiff:
Whendid Estinfil
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Miami-Dade County, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
