Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Thompson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00767
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont de Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tamar Thompson, William Spangler, Randall Lynn Spaustat and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
STANLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66068
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STANLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58889
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STANLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORMLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54458
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STANLEY GORMLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STANLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv62589
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Townsel v. Thomas et al
as 4:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Townsel
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Jefferson Dunn, Grantt Culliver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsel v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Townsel, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and St. Clair Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Few v. John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Few, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Gerald Couch, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Few v. Sentinel Offender Services et al
as 2:2013cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Few, Jr.
Defendant:
Sentinel Offender Services and Lauren Allen
Payne v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Michael Stanley Payne
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
