Cases 1 - 10 of 107
Davis v. Nava et al
as 2:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Tammy Davis
Defendant:
Brinlee Alysse Nava, Erin Khan and Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Zarfati et al v. Artsana USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21372
Plaintiff:
Lexi Leigh Zarfati, Michelle Williams, Jordana Morris and others
Defendant:
Artsana USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Navas Feliciano v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Adal Antonio Navas Feliciano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Navas Feliciano v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Adal Antonio Navas Feliciano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NAVAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27800
Plaintiff:
BRYAN NAVAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nava v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Munoz Nava
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
USA v. Nava Hajiabadi
as 23-12090
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
NAVA HAJIABADI
NAVA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14109
Plaintiff:
AUDRA NAVA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SOZA v. FRITANGA EL CHELE, INC et al
as 1:2023cv20756
Plaintiff:
CINTHYA Y. SOZA
Defendant:
FRITANGA EL CHELE, INC, JORGE M. NAVAS and GUADALUPE M. NAVAS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
