Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Cochran et al v. Labat et al
as 1:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas Cochran
Defendant:
Sheriff Patrick Labat, Officer Reid Thornton, Officer K. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv24707
Plaintiff:
CALEB J HENDERSON
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY CORRECTIONS, MARIO MARTIN, K HALLFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. JONES et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK DOUGLAS DIXON
Defendant:
Warden JONES, Warden WISZ, Nurse JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Wexford et al
as 1:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Wexford, Supervisor Murphy, Nurse Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
David Lee Moore
Defendant:
Ricky S. Dixon, Warden Lane, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. SPEAR et al
as 3:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
SPEAR, CARR, NURSE JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASKIN v. BRANDEBURGE
as 3:2021cv00697
Defendant:
BRANDEBURGE, REYES, NURSE JONES and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE v. LAND et al
as 5:2021cv00041
Defendant:
NURSE JONES, J H LAND, MCDUFFIE and others
Plaintiff:
BJON LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Unknown Chatham County Correctional Staff et al
as 4:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jah'mz Mikhal Ransom and Jah
Defendant:
Officer White, Mr. Mclain, John Welcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Officer White, Chatham County Detention Center, Mr. Mclain and others
Plaintiff:
Joh'mz Mikhal Ransom and Jah'mz Mikhal Ransom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.