Cases 1 - 10 of 11
IPS Avon Park Corporation, et al v. Kinder Morgan, Inc., et al
as 22-10547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IPS AVON PARK CORPORATION and D E JONES CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KINDER MORGAN, INC., EL PASO LLC and MESQUITE INVESTORS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
IPS Avon Park Corporation et al v. Kinder Morgan, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01643
Defendant:
Mesquite Investors, L.L.C., Shady Hills Power Company, L.L.C., El Paso LLC and others
Plaintiff:
IPS Avon Park Corporation and D E Jones Consulting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Triplett v. Central Parking Systems of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03193
Plaintiff:
Michael Triplett
Defendant:
Central Parking Systems of Georgia, Inc. , Carell Atlanta, LLC , Standard Parking Corporation IL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loven v. Occoquan Group Mount Dora Corporation
as 6:2014cv00328
Plaintiff:
Robert Loven
Defendant:
Occoquan Group Baldwin Park Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Swaggerty v. National Parking Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01335
Plaintiff:
Rodney Swaggerty
Defendant:
National Parking Corporation and Alex Farrington
Oliver v. Standard Parking Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv04223
Plaintiff:
Leonard Oliver
Defendant:
Standard Parking Corporation and John Does 1-5
Collins v. Standard Parking Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv04222
Plaintiff:
Calvin J. Collins
Defendant:
Standard Parking Corporation and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SPARROW-VOORHEES et al v. STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION
as 4:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
TABATHA SPARROW-VOORHEES and MAURICE COOKS
Defendant:
STANDARD PARKING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
