Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Paul Edwards v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10826
Petitioner:
PAUL EDWARDS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
DELCAMPO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12959
Plaintiff:
PAUL EDWARD DELCAMPO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GRIMALA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11085
Plaintiff:
PAUL EDWARD GRIMALA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Paul Lee, Jr.
as 23-13057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL EDWARD LEE, JR.
Edwards v. Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv60942
Plaintiff:
Paul Edwards
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRADY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10539
Plaintiff:
PAUL EDWARD BRADY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ray et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dewayne Scott, James Edward Rayford, Timothy William Palivoda and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13226
Plaintiff:
PAUL EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DUTTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11722
Plaintiff:
PAUL EDWARD DUTTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson-Washington v. GILLESPIE et al
as 0:2022cv60958
Plaintiff:
Andramedia Cheryl Robinson-Washington
Defendant:
KENNETH L. GILLESPIE, SHARI AFRICK OLEFSON, KlM THERESA MOLLICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
