Cases 1 - 10 of 21
WATSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04656
Plaintiff:
CARL R WATSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sixth District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2021cv01284
Defendant:
Wandy Taylor, Tim McFalls, Rocky Raffle and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia Muslim Voter Project, Latino Community Fund of Georgia, Women Watch Afrika and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
ALFORD et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05652
Plaintiff:
DAVENNIA POPE, DEREL SMITH, LUZ MARIE LOMELI VELASCO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anton WatsonIn re: Anton Watson
as 19-14239
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: ANTON R. WATSON
Anton WatsonIn re: Anton Watson
as 19-12956
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: ANTON R. WATSON
ALFORD et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02066
Plaintiff:
DAVENNIA POPE, DEREL SMITH, RODNEY D. CULLORS and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anton Watson v. USA
as 17-11304
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTON R. WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Anton Watson
as 16-15475
Petitioner:
In re: ANTON R. WATSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Anton Watson
as 16-13433
Petitioner:
In re: ANTON R. WATSON
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Watson v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00271
Petitioner:
Anton R. Watson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
